Validation of the aphasic depression rating scale.
نویسندگان
چکیده
BACKGROUND AND PURPOSE The Aphasic Depression Rating Scale (ADRS) was developed to detect and measure depression in aphasic patients during the subacute stage of stroke. METHODS Six experts selected an initial sampling of behavioral items from existing depression rating scales. Stroke patients (aphasic and nonaphasic) were assessed with these items by the rehabilitation staff, with the Hamilton Depression Rating Scale (HDRS) for nonaphasic patients only, by a psychiatrist, and by the rehabilitation staff with Visual Analog Scales (VAS). A second item selection was conducted after a regression algorithm was run including VAS as independent variables (criterion validity) and after their factorial structure was analyzed with a principal component analysis (factorial validity). The construct validity was evaluated with respect to the other depression assessments. A threshold for the diagnosis of depression was computed with respect to the psychiatrist's diagnosis. Interrater and test-retest reliability were assessed in 2 additional groups of aphasic patients. RESULTS Eighty patients participated in the study (59 aphasic). Fifteen behavioral items from existing depression rating scales were selected, and 9 were retained after the validation process. ADRS correlated highly with VAS and HDRS (r=0.60 to 0.78, P=10(-4) to 10(-6)). With respect to the psychiatrist's diagnosis, the sensitivity and specificity of ADRS were 0.83 and 0.71, respectively, when the threshold was set at 9/32. Its factorial structure was comparable to HDRS structure. Interrater and test-retest reliability were high (average kappa coefficient of the 9 items=0.69). CONCLUSIONS ADRS is a valid, reliable, sensitive, and specific tool for the evaluation of depression in aphasic patients during the stroke subacute phase.
منابع مشابه
The Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression: The making of a “gold standard” and the unmaking of a chronic illness, 1960–1980
OBJECTIVES To show why and how the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression became the 'Gold Standard' for assessing therapies from the mid-1960s and how it was used to frame depression as a short-term and curable illness rather than a chronic one. METHODS My approach is that of the social construction of knowledge, identifying the interests, institutional contexts and practices that produce know...
متن کاملویژگیهای روانسنجی نسخه فارسی مقیاس درجهبندی افسردگی دوقطبی (BDRS) در بیماران و جمعیت بهنجار ایرانی
Objectives: Bipolar and unipolar depressions are different in terms of both biological or clinical sign and symptoms, so the available scales are not suitable for measuring the depression in bipolar disorder. The aim of the present study was to determine the psychometric features of the Persian Version of Bipolar Depression Rating Scale (BDRS). Method: A total of 368 participants, including 120...
متن کاملDevelopment and validation of a geriatric depression screening scale: a preliminary report.
A new Geriatric Depression Scale (GDS) designed specifically for rating depression in the elderly was tested for reliability and validity and compared with the Hamilton Rating Scale for Depression (HRS-D) and the Zung Self-Rating Depression Scale (SDS). In constructing the GDS a 100-item questionnaire was administered to normal and severely depressed subjects. The 30 questions most highly corre...
متن کاملبررسی ارتباط میزان افسردگی و مهارت در شطرنج اعضای دارای درجه بین المللی بازی در فدراسیون شطرنج جمهوری اسلامی ایران در سال 1389
Background : Our purpose in this research was to evaluate the correlation between skill in chess (international chess rating scale) and severity of depression and anxiety and ten cognitive errors in members of Iranian Chess Federation that have international chess rating scale as well as to study the prevalence of depression and anxiety in the sample. Methods: 96 persons that had an interna...
متن کاملClinical Validation of the Psychotic Depression Assessment Scale, Hamilton Depression Rating Scale-6, and Brief Psychiatric Rating Scale-5: Results from the Clinical Research Center for Depression Study
OBJECTIVE The aim of this study was to validate the psychotic depression assessment scale (PDAS), which includes the six-item melancholia subscale from the Hamilton depression rating scale (HAMD-6) and the five-item psychosis subscale from the brief psychiatric rating scale (BPRS-5). Data from the Clinical Research Center for Depression (CRESCEND) study, which is a 52-week naturalistic trial, w...
متن کاملذخیره در منابع من
با ذخیره ی این منبع در منابع من، دسترسی به آن را برای استفاده های بعدی آسان تر کنید
برای دانلود متن کامل این مقاله و بیش از 32 میلیون مقاله دیگر ابتدا ثبت نام کنید
ثبت ناماگر عضو سایت هستید لطفا وارد حساب کاربری خود شوید
ورودعنوان ژورنال:
- Stroke
دوره 35 7 شماره
صفحات -
تاریخ انتشار 2004